Chamblee54

A popular blogger put up a post yesterday, We can’t end ‘rape culture’ if we don’t end hook-up culture. Now, RC/HUC are dodgy concepts. Just last week, PG saw a post about RC, that started “If you are a man, you are part of rape culture.”
On the other hand, the “blogger, writer, and professional sayer of truths” has a wide audience. Any trickle down to this slack blog would be appreciated. The BWPST also answers comments, using a psuedonym. He is easily provoked. If you don’t want trolls to start trouble, then you should not answer them. Some people are easily amused.
The fun started when BWPST said “Just like every other problem in the culture, it’s ALL about rebellion against God.” When a Jesus worshiper talks about G-d, he means something very different from PG. One of the few things that PG believes is G-d does not write books. PG made a comment, and the fun began. Entertainment is not what it used to be.
chamblee54 “Just like every other problem in the culture, it’s ALL about rebellion against God.” The first commandment says to hold no other G-d before you. This does not mean a book. When you declare a book, compiled by a Catholic committee, to be the word of G-d, then you are violating this common sense rule. Violating this rule causes problems. Mo, are you Matt?
Mo @ chamblee54 “The first commandment says to hold no other G-d before you. This does not mean a book.”What on EARTH are you talking about? “When you declare a book, compiled by a Catholic committee, to be the word of G-d, then you are violating this common sense rule.” I haven’t declared anything, especially anything regarding Catholicism, as I am not Catholic. Show me where I mentioned anything about Catholicism? Nor did Catholics compile the Word of God. Take your nonsense elsewhere. I have zero time or patience for it.
chamblee54 Mo, are you Matt?
Mo @ chamblee54 “Mo, are you Matt?” How about addressing the POINTS I made to you and the questions I asked? Another troll, capable of nothing but repeating the same nonsense over and over.
chamblee54 Ok, I don’t know where, or if, you said anything about the Roman Catholic Church. My point was about the Bible. The canon of the Christian church was compiled by a group of men. I might be mistaken on this point, but I believe they were Catholics. Whether of not the compilers of the bible were, or were not, Catholic is beside the point I want to make. That point is that the bible is not the word of G-d. G-d does not write books. When you confuse a book for G-d, you violate the first commandment. “How about addressing the POINTS I made to you and the questions I asked?” “Take your nonsense elsewhere. I have zero time or patience for it.” This is a contradiction.
Mo @ chamblee54 “Ok, I don’t know where, or if, you said anything about the Roman Catholic Church.” Okay, then your comment has no point since that’s what’s your crabbing about. Go troll someone else. Do not waste my time.
That is the end of the dialog. There is not much more to say. If you want to skip ahead, and look at the pictures (from “The Special Collections and Archives, Georgia State University Library”,) you probably won’t miss much.
It is about the idea of “rebellion against G-d.” When you assume that a book contains the “word of G-d,” and use that assumption as a weapon to attack other people, that would seem to be “rebellion against G-d.” When you believe that a soveriegn deity is interested in your petty quarells, that might be “rebellion against G-d.” When you spend your time arguing with “trolls,” that might not be “rebellion against G-d,” but it looks foolish to those who don’t share your beliefs. Maybe it is time for both “Mo” and chamblee54 to find a better use of the talent that somebody gave them.