Chamblee54

The embedded link takes you to Make Love Not Porn: Cindy Gallop at TEDxOxford. Ms. Gallop pitches her venture, makelovenotporn.com The idea is for couples people to submit videos of sexual activity. The submitter pays a fee, as does the person who streams the video. The streaming fees will be shared with the video submitter. If all goes well, people will have a healthier attitude about fucking, and a healthier bank account to go with it. There were comments.
HardforJesus Porn bothers her because after young men watch it enough, they couldn’t possibly get hard looking at her. 
tyler lewis the part I am having trouble with is believing that all these young guys want to sleep with this old woman, she is not attractive or sexy so what else could it be
Jonathan Nagel I’ll tell you why she gets fucked by young men. It’s because she has a pussy. Men will fuck anything when horny. I have. 
Ariel Tsun I’d do it and I’m not even a guy. Ever heard of a sapiosexual?
The last comment made PG think. The always helpful Urban Dictionary has this to say. Sapiosexual (adj) A form of sexual orientation characterized by a strong attraction to intelligence in others, often regardless of gender and/or conventional attractiveness.(n) A sapiosexual person.”I am sapiosexual. I think geeks and nerds are sexy–I often want to rub my clit against their minds.” -Kayar Silkenvoice. This UD definition is sponsored by nomorerack.
Collinsdictionary says “Sapiosexual is a neologism word (recently constructed word) that has come into common usage;, especially on social networking sites where some people are self-identifying as sapiosexual. Origins: From Latin root sapien, wise or intelligent, and Latin sexualis, relating to the sexes.” There are comments.
blancasd Irony: Using “Sapiophile” or “Sapiosexual”, made up words, to describe how you’re turned on by intelligence. Seriously, has anyone ever been turned on by how dumb someone is? “Oh my, his stupidity makes me moist!” Said no one ever.
r.bannon87 The fact that you used the word moist instead of wet, makes me think your kind of dumb. Now add in the fact that I think your dumb use of the word “moist” is just a little bit appealing. So, not only have I shown you to be wrong, but now I task you with creating the word for my attraction to your lack of intelligence.
If you haven’t lost interest already, there is a rap video and sapiosexual dot com to amuse you. There is even the Sapiosexual Test, sponsored by Decatur Family Psychiatry. Out of dedication to his craft, PG decided to take the Sapiosexual Test.
The test is 20 statements. A sample is “I would find it unbearable to tolerate unintelligence in my romantic partner.” You choose between one and five, from strongly disagree to strongly agree. PG got 55%. This is in the middle. “25 – 75 points = This is an average score. You do find intelligence attractive but not necessary for sexual attraction.” Pictures today are from “The Special Collections and Archives, Georgia State University Library”.